-
Website
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports -
Original page
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/06/13/time-to-end-inter-league-play/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sam
1 comment · 1 points
-
kathleen24
1 comment · 59 points
-
erkmann42
2 comments · 1 points
-
sman194
1 comment · 1 points
-
golfman_story
2 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The Jets chose not to show up …
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
My Week 10 NFL picks … Pats in squeaker
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
We are here in Foxboro, Bill Burt and Hector Longo
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
4th-and-2 what do you do?
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Vegas says: Saints-Colts Super Bowl
3 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
The Jets chose not to show up …
Though, I don't think we need to play the Braves every year. Rivalries are rivalries, but we've got a lot more invested in the TB Devil Rays feud than anything with Atlanta. I say, play the rivalries when they exist, otherwise, spread the action around.
Angels/Dodgers is big right now (due, at least a little, to the Anaheim name-change); Mets/Yankees should be big for a long time to come (either set of fans like to see their team pound an inferior cross-town squad, and both appreciate good baseball when their respective clubs are competitive); and that's about it.
Not forcing the "Historic Rival Series" gives more freedom in scheduling, and MLB can use it to their advantage on a year-to-year basis to draw interesting match-ups. For example, a Red Sox/Marlins series would have been compelling after the Josh Beckett trade; certainly a Giants/Athletics series would drum up some interest after Zito switched leagues.
You could also schedule World Series rematches, and "almost" world series rematches (NLCS runner-up vs. ALCS champs, or NLCS/ALCS runners-up vs. each other), again, on a season-to-season basis.
Overall, I like seeing teams outside the league, I don't like seeing the Braves as often as we do, and I think the DH rule should be eliminated before interleague play is.
-Tom
Alternately: I think we should do completely away with the time lost to interleage games and give that time to a two-week, mid-season, World Baseball Classic tournament culminating in All-Star festivities.
Rivalry weekends will switch off home/away year to year.
And you'd replace the lost interleague games with league opponents outside the division.
While the interleague schedule is imbalanced, the same argument can be loosely made with the NFL. But with more NFL teams than games in the season...
If MLB wants to keep their infatuation with interleague play, they should figure out a way to even out the playing schedule. If this eliminates some of the 19 games vs. NYY, then so be it.
Please visit Petition to End Interleague Play and read it. If you agree, please sign it and consider posting it on this blog.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mlb2007/petition....
I'm hoping to spread the word among serious baseball fans. I realize it may do very little, but I thought it was time we stop complaining to each other and tell management how we feel. Thanks!
Besides, wouldn't that make a WSox-Cubs, and Yanks-Mets series even more special if it happened just once every three years?
I think so ...
Nice prediction on the Rockies series! Post something new, would ya?
I'd like to see the Cubs play at Fenway and the Sox play at Wrigley. They are the two most storied parks in baseball, and the atmosphere would be phenomenal.
I'm for interleague play, but I agree with those who'd like it tweaked. Let's ditch the silly, madeup rivalries - like us and the Braves - and see some different teams each year.
Hey Tim: blogs are free, dude. Bill gets to post whenever he wants.