<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ETBlogs Sports - Latest Comments in Super Bowl facts: Who pays for the rings?</title><link>http://etblogs-sports.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://etblogs-sports.disqus.com/super_bowl_facts_who_pays_for_the_rings/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 21:49:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Super Bowl facts: Who pays for the rings?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2008/01/27/super-bowl-facts-who-pays-for-the-rings/#comment-6985936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The NFL has more money then they can shake a stick at... even in these hard times.  I wouldn't be suprised if they bought everyone assiciated with theNFL a ring after every year.... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roberto Coin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 21:49:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl facts: Who pays for the rings?</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2008/01/27/super-bowl-facts-who-pays-for-the-rings/#comment-5697764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i didn't know that. Interesting fact.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max Kliman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>