-
Website
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports -
Original page
http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2008/03/27/question-1-should-jacoby-ellsbury-replace-coco-crisp/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sam
1 comment · 1 points
-
erkmann42
2 comments · 1 points
-
sman194
1 comment · 1 points
-
Swing Trading
1 comment · 2 points
-
Late Hotel
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The Jets chose not to show up …
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
4th-and-2 what do you do?
4 days ago · 1 comment
-
My Week 10 NFL picks … Pats in squeaker
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Pats-Colts stat of the day: Rodney Harrison 5-0 vs. Peyton Manning
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Halflway home: My Super Six NFL teams
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
The Jets chose not to show up …
For the defense -- I think Ellsbury's terrific catch the other day is actually a demonstration of how much he has to learn. It was a terrific catch, no argument, but the reason he had to make a terrific catch, instead of a merely good one, is that first, he wasn't in great position in the first place and had to go a long way, and second, he misjudged the wall (there's no warning track in that stadium, so it's understandable, but nevertheless it was a misjudgement). What we saw last year with Crisp was not only the spectacular catches like Ellsbury's, but more importantly everything that even came close was gobbled up, often making it look routine.
Ellsbury is athletic enough that he can make up for his rookie misjudgements a lot of the time, but I think Crisp is still much better defensively.
Offensively, the Ellsbury we saw last fall was a lucky, lucky, kid on a hot streak. He turned a lot of soft nubbers into base hits, and he didn't have all that many really hard-hit, convincing hits. Credit to him for using his speed, but you can't rely on getting on base from soft infield hits on a long-term basis. Several of those could easily have been taken away from him and he'd be left with a pedestrian (Crisp-like) average.
On the other hand, at this moment it does look as if he has more potential than Crisp. I think this year Crisp and Ellsbury would be a wash -- or Crisp will be better. But Ellsbury is ready for the majors, and it looks like once he gets seasoning here he will be better than Crisp, next year or the year after. The Sox are in this for the long run. I think having Ellsbury up this year doesn't significantly hurt the Sox' chances this year, and improves their chances over the next couple years.
Very good discussion. Ian, though, I believe you are being way too hard on Ellsbury. He misjudged his leap, sure, but he made the catch.
I am not 100 percent sure Ellsbury will be a star this year, but my argument more focuses on Crisp's inability to hit. I feel bad for him at the plate. He is confused too often, guessing wrong a lot.
I was wrong about Crisp. I thought he was going to be a perfect fit here as a leadoff guy and star fielder. His defense has been up to snuff, but not his bat, which really killed the Sox last year (he and Lugo). But their pitching and hitting was good enough, as well as Dustin Pedroia's ascension to make up for Coco's weak bat.
Ellsbury is better, right now, overall, I believe. My guess is there will be a week-long, 5-for-34 stretch in there for Ellsbury, but he will overcome it.
Again, nice posts.
It's one or the other. You seem to be on the fence, at least for now. Coco or Ellsbury, right now?