ETBlogs Sports - Latest Comments in Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Nashua — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:56:37 -0000

"Congratulations to the Red Sox"

I was wrong, I was wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong about the Red Sox. I didn't think that they would make the playoffs and I'm here to now eat crow as I said I would. I like it well done.
caw caw caw Good luck in the playoffs.

Again Congrats' to the Red Sox and all their happy fans.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

pasta diving lugo — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:50:27 -0000

Buchholz not in post season due to "shoulder fatique."

boy they kept that a secret for as long as they could.

too bad there is no one in the media who can spot a pitcher who has shoulder fatique. you would think it would be a simple matter of monitoring bullpen sessions or noticing a fall off in bullpen work....god do our sportwriters in this town just NOT KNOW THE SPORT THEY ARE COVERING.

dicey-k was dice-k last night. first time he could answer the rep as a "big game" pitcher.

if he can do it 4 more times, we're a world serious winner.

schill and becky can go one and two but it takes three. i always thought Buchholz was our ace in the hole but now it has to be dice-k

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

pasta diving lugo — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:17:43 -0000

i was wrong. thank god.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

pasta diving lugo — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:49:18 -0000

buffalo head: what do you know that we don't? what part of over 6 era and no post season positives don't you understand? maybe and I do mean MAYBE for a short term inning of relief in a non save situation. I still remember aaron effing boone and do not want to see wake on the mound in cold weather. NO NO NO NO. Please God NO!!!!!!

tonight is sick. I hate this stuff. sawks have never seen this kid Slowey who has put up career highs in innings pitched (seven) and strikeouts (nine) in his last outing That was his second consecutive quality start and he's getting his final look see for next year's rotation. lot's of incentive for the kid and lots of incentive for his lineup to help out.

WHY ARE WE STARTING DICEY-K? jesus, of all the times ot give the kid a time off before the post season and here we are STARTING HIM AGAIN. He has been pitiful In four September starts, Matsuzaka is 1-1 with a 9.74 ERA. Also Matsuzaka hasn't faced the Twins in his career. This is sick. i think we are pissing away the dvision title. Am I the only one who thinks this is STUPID. Why can't we start kyle snyder and try for five or six inninggs out of him or buccholz? Dicey-K has been showing all the signs of excessive wear.

I hope I'm wrong but I am almost always right.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Buffalohead — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:19:43 -0000

Hey Rob,

You cant leave Wake out of the starting rotation! Please check your head!

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

pasta diving lugo — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:11:27 -0000

not that we've written him off steven c., just that the post season record is not there. he has an era over 6 and it is generally attributed to the knuckler not dancing in the cold weather.

i don't know how you've been looking at lester, burt but "rock solid" does not come to my mind...

the sawks are not really built for post season. we need to sign santana next year. you need 3 pitchers, and all we have are two. we could get by a short series. but good pitching generally shuts down good hitting. good hitting allows you to pulverize lesser clubs with poor pitching.

sawks are not a small ball club and do not run from 1st to third like the angels. they are a station to station hitting team and that does not work that well in the post season.

bucholtz is the key to the post season. lester is long relief. he needs to give us three more games in two seven game series. we should be able to get by a short series without using him. if we lose the short five game series, well we're not going to use him at all.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Steven C — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:57:05 -0000

Has everybody basically written off Tim Wakefield as a starter in the playoffs?
It seems like everyone has. Though he hasn't pitched great lately, there is a chance he could be unhittable.
Just a thought.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Colin — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:47:18 -0000

Gary, you can't base your playoff rotation on the assumption that Carmona is going to dominate like he did in the regular season. His terrible relief outings last year show that he may very well pitch poorly under pressure.

Schilling is one of the greatest big-game pitchers of all time, and he needs to be No. 2. For any team, the prospect of facing Beckett and Schilling in the first two games of a series is downright scary. Facing Beckett and Dice-K, not so much.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

Subhash Roy — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:04:15 -0000

Depends on home/away splits

Game 1/2 Home
1 - Josh
2 - Curt
3 - Dice K
4 - Lester
Game 1/2 Away
1 - Josh
2 - Dice K
3- Curt
4 - Lester

Dice's ERA on the road is ~1 less than on the road 4.02 vs 5.1, Curt's H/W split is less than 0.5.
Wake becomes the innings eater.

Re: Playoffs: Name your Red Sox rotation (and why)

GaryFromChapelHill — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:27:57 -0000

Stealing this idea from reading SOSH, this makes sense to me:

1) Beckett
2) Dice-K
3) Schilling
4) Lester

Dice-K goes #2 because *if he's on* he has just as good a chance of beating a #2 like Carmona as Schilling. But if he's bad, then the Sox probably lose to a #3. I have more confidence that Schilling could outduel a #3 more consistently. Whew... hard to explain.

I think Wakefield/Lester is a toss-up *on the mound*, but if Wakefield pitches, Mirabelli has to bat, weakening the lineup. Plus the problems holding runners (especially if we play Anaheim).

But I think, in the end, Wakefield starts.